Year in Reading

A Year in Reading: 2016

By posted at 6:00 am on December 1, 2016 6

yircover2016

We typically schedule the essays and reviews and lists we run at The Millions a week or two in advance. Before the U.S. election, I looked at what we had in the hopper and tried to arrange the posts for timeliness. This was basically a symbolic gesture since The Millions is a total literary miscellany, and mostly contributor-driven — we don’t have the budget to commission much work (see publisher Max Magee’s call for support here). Max and I conferred about what to run on election day itself; we agreed that a lovely, calm installment of Hannah Gersen’s Proust Diary was the thing. I asked him what we should run if Donald Trump won. “SHUT IT ALL DOWN,” he wrote, sort of joking.

It’s obvious now that our disbelief was a luxury — there were plenty of people who knew it could happen. But the shock was real, and so too was the subsequent urge to shut it down. It was unclear, in the days immediately following the election, how a literary site could possibly matter when Donald Trump was the President of the United States, when it felt that all efforts should henceforth be directed at subverting the new regime. (It’s still unclear.)

But then the Year in Reading entries started coming in, from more than 70 writers. This is the 13th year of the series, and it feels like the most necessary yet. The entries have a measure of fear and grief, yes. They are about reckoning with the past, and preparing for the future. They are also full of beauty, full of sensitivity, full of intelligence, full of curiosity and care. They are about dissolving in someone else’s consciousness. About sharing suffering. About taking a break. About falling in love.

Based on the entries this year, I can confirm that readers are still very into Elena Ferrante. But there are many other names to discover in this series — exciting debuts and forgotten classics and authors whose names were on the tip of your tongue. There are hundreds of books: novels, essays, works of nonfiction, and poems.

As in prior years, the names of our 2016 contributors will be unveiled throughout the month as entries are published (starting with our traditional opener from Languagehat’s Stephen Dodson). Bookmark this post, load up the main page, subscribe to our RSS feed, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter to make sure you don’t miss an entry — we’ll run three or four per day. And if you look forward to the Year in Reading every year, please consider supporting the site and ensuring this December tradition continues for years to come.

There are difficult weeks and years ahead, but we hope you’ll be momentarily refreshed and heartened as you hear from an array of prodigious readers and writers. At the very least, you’ll find something good to read.

-Lydia Kiesling

Don’t miss: A Year in Reading 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005





Share this article

More from the Millions

6 Responses to “A Year in Reading: 2016”

  1. Jack M
    at 8:01 am on December 1, 2016

    This is one of the best things about the end of a year!

  2. Nick Moran
    at 1:28 pm on December 1, 2016

    Year in Reading is officially a teenager now. That’s incredible! I expect it to start making fun of adults and avoiding dinner discussions any minute now.

  3. Evelyn Walsh
    at 10:55 pm on December 1, 2016

    Thanks so much for Year in Reading and what you do all year long. Yes it matters yes I said yes

  4. priskill
    at 3:40 pm on December 2, 2016

    Wait for this all year — and love the site. Thank you!

  5. Kelsey
    at 2:49 pm on December 5, 2016

    Just so you know, Tess Malone’s article was posted twice, under her name and Tana French’s name. On a positive note, I’ve been waiting months for a Year in Reading!

  6. Lydia Kiesling
    at 2:53 pm on December 5, 2016

    Fixed–thank you!

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.