Reviews

Die a Million People: On ‘The Colonel Who Would Not Repent’

By posted at 12:00 pm on May 9, 2016 7

cover

The lyrics to “Song of Bangladesh” must have sounded mournful when Joan Baez first crooned them in Madison Square Garden in August 1971: “When the sun sinks in the west, die a million people of the Bangladesh / The story of Bangladesh is an ancient one again made fresh.”

The occasion was as solemn as the words: along with George Harrison, Eric Clapton, and Bob Dylan, Baez was headlining the first-ever star-studded humanitarian benefit. The Concert for Bangla Desh aimed to support a soon-to-be-independent nation, then enduring a vicious armed conflict. However heartfelt that event, though, Bangladesh’s plight soon lapsed into obscurity in the West. Today, those describing the events of 1971 to Western audiences must often resort to comparisons to another, similarly scaled but much later event: the 1994 Rwanda genocide.

South Asia, by contrast, views Bangladesh’s founding as central to its present-day politics — and now, through Indian journalist Salil Tripathi’s The Colonel Who Would Not Repent: The Bangladesh War and Its Unquiet Legacy, the story is again made fresh. Tripathi’s book revisits Bangladesh’s founding in comprehensive detail. Poignantly, its publication comes at a moment when the nation seems on the verge of its next existential crisis — one that includes now-frequent slayings that the author himself is speaking up against.

The basic facts of Tripathi’s story are well-established. Bangladesh is a country the size of Iowa, surrounded on three sides by India and on the fourth by the Bay of Bengal. It’s long been defined by its language, which boasts the first-ever Asian Nobel laureate for literature, and by its blend of secular, Hindu, and Muslim customs. The area became a province of Pakistan during India’s 1947 Partition; its western masters severely subjugated it. (“Colonialism was not the word for it,” journalist Anthony Mascarenhas said of Pakistan’s abuse of Bengalis in his 1971 book The Rape of Bangla Desh. “A thousand statistical tables would not reflect this Bengali frustration.”) By 1970, two decades of political organizing culminated in Bengalis sweeping Pakistan’s national election. The government reacted to the new Bengali prime minister, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, and his party’s parliamentary supermajority with desultory negotiations, and then, on March 25, 1971, a military attack. The conflict would last until Bangladesh’s victory that December 16, 1971; in the 267 days between, Baez’s “die a million people” arguably became a literal, perhaps even modest, tally of civilian casualties.

covercoverIn recent years, authors have begun to revisit Bangladesh’s history. Gary Bass’s 2013 The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissinger and a Forgotten Genocide retraces U.S. complicity in the atrocities. Yasmin Saikia’s 2011 Women, War and the Making of Bangladesh focuses on Pakistan’s rapes of over 200,000 women in just nine months, and, unusually, includes Pakistani sepoys’ apologies for their part in the violence. What remains less well-known is the territory where Tripathi, thankfully, spends most of The Colonel Who Would Not Repent: the experience of ordinary Bengalis. In large part, the book functions best to fill in history’s rough outline with vivid depictions of wartime conditions; stories of common courage; and rare, specific recognition of innocents who died.

The best scenes come during accounts like this one, from the survivor of a massacre in a town called Chuknagar:

As Ershad Ali ran through the town…he saw Sundari. She was a child, barely six months old, clinging to her mother’s breast. Her mother lay beside her, and there was blood all over her body. The mother was beautiful, and she had a sindoor in her hair, indicating she was married and a Hindu. Her eyes were wide open; she was dead. She had been feeding her daughter when the bullet got her. ‘I carried the girl in my arms,’ Ershad said…

He ran through the market, seeing many more dead bodies, including many Hindus he had grown up with — Kalachand, who played the drum at Hindu weddings; Bhogirath, who worked as a butcher; Digambar, who was a farmer; and Babunath Biswas, the grocer — all while he kept hearing more and more gunshots. There were many Muslims, too, among the dead –Saifuddin, the butcher; Murshid Ali, the shopkeeper who sold coal; his five children; and Inayat, the mentally disabled man with the mind of a toddler. They were all dead.

Ershad crouched low and passed the maidan and went to the home of Mandar Das, a Hindu man he knew. ‘My father has just been killed,’ he told Mandar. ‘I am going to get the cloth to bury him. On my way I saw this girl…Her mother is a Hindu. Can you look after her?’

Mandar Das and his wife decide to adopt the girl, naming her Sundari. (“I knew she was a Hindu, that’s why I had taken her to a Hindu family. I did not want her stolen from her people,” Ershad Ali concludes.)

Tripathi counterbalances heart-breaking scenes like these with judicious attention to the facts of the genocide. Importantly, he acknowledges that precise counts of those killed are impossible, whether in Chuknagar (which was “a transit point,” a crossroads) or countrywide. Saying as much is controversial in Bangladesh; Tripathi correctly states that many Bangladeshis irrationally insist that three million people died, and “feel that raising such a doubt undermines their suffering and belittles their identity.” Yet he offers a coolheaded overview of the debate, straightforwardly concluding “We simply don’t know.” Just as evenhandedly, he gives credit to Pakistanis — a group who Bangladeshi protest movements have recently made the target of insults like “filthy dogs” — for a recent acknowledgment of national wrongdoing via the 2012 anthology We Owe an Apology to Bangladesh. “It was a brave thing to do,” Tripathi says, “and it was commendable.”

For all its careful balance of emotion and logic, The Colonel isn’t entirely successful. Tripathi’s decision to largely forgo a chronological structure leaves him recounting critical movements in Bangladeshi history at fairly random intervals, often jumping from before the war to after and back again. The disorganization robs the text of power. (By the time a middle-aged Sundari reunites with Ershad Ali in the final pages, the occasion feels more perfunctory than uplifting.) His often tangled management of characters and locations also make the book most comprehensible to readers already aware of Bangladesh’s historical events and prominent figures. Less informed, non-South Asian readers — those for whom the story of Bangladesh truly is both ancient and fresh — will likely have a far tougher time grasping the significance of the book’s more prominent people, places, and dates.

What is far more tragic is that the story is effectively neither ancient nor fresh in Bangladesh itself. Rather, it is the antecedent to the horrors unfolding now. Tripathi’s book extends to the present day, and includes frank discussion of the violent riots, dysfunctional politics, and climate change vulnerability that have afflicted Bangladesh recently. The Colonel Who Would Not Repent serves, then, as a primer to the current crisis — including the extremists’ slaying of foreigners, non-Muslims, and writers that has begun since the book’s completion. Now pressing for international response to the slayings, Tripathi is once again working to protect the same people he champions in these pages.





Share this article

More from the Millions

7 Responses to “Die a Million People: On ‘The Colonel Who Would Not Repent’”

  1. Heather Curran
    at 5:39 pm on May 9, 2016

    Tagore. His name is Tagore. Nice to remember George Harrison, another rock star’s ill fated attempt to bring attention to the catastrophic violence that took place in the 70’s, but better to remember the poet and writer who won The Nobel Prize for literature: Tagore. Amnesty International and PEN America need help and pressure from people like you and me to join and write letters, petition, donate. Let Bono et al sit this one out. Dreadful the way we remember crimes against humanity by whatever celebrity of the day chooses to adopt it. Let’s keep our writers and journalists safe. Murdered, tortured, jailed world wide. It is our duty as humans to be aware and that the author of this article has to compare Bangladesh to Rwanda for people to understand, then they may as well forget it. Cambodia, South Africa, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, Israel, Uganda all murdering and jailing and warring and silencing activists to prevent us from knowing. Again the writer’s name is Tagore.

  2. QMS Kibria
    at 5:55 pm on May 9, 2016

    Wow! Zero chill.

    His first name was Rabindranath as well. Kobiguru Rabindranath Tagore. And he was joined in Bengali literature and poetry by Nazrul Islam, Mukkhopadhyay, and later the Hungry Generation, Humayun Ahmed, and many more. There is a vibrant literature in Bangladesh. No need to fret about it — only problem is many Westerners don’t know the names. But they do know Harrison, et al.

    Also there is a link to the Nobel Prize website there.

  3. Heather Curran
    at 9:33 pm on May 9, 2016

    Ms. Newman, respect you for bringing the issue of murdered writers and bloggers to our attention and apologies for my tone, QMS, I seriously didn’t see the link, but still an essay should be complete without links no? Unless it is a book mentioned (which I’ve never clicked, but I believe it sends you to Amazon’s site. Just get a little worked up about human rights abuses which as a planet of what? several billion? we can’t seem to get a handle on. Yes, I know, rape, pillage, oppression, torture, mass murder from time immemorial, yada yada yada. Chilling out now!

  4. J Bergman
    at 8:12 am on May 10, 2016

    Joan Baez did not participate in the Concert for Bangladesh.

  5. Christopher
    at 5:29 pm on May 11, 2016

    Well, did Joan Baez perform at the concert or not? Wikipedia says yes, but has no confirming source. George Harrison’s website does not mention Joan at the concert. It seems like an oversight, or perhaps a rewriting of history to say she co-headlined the concert and then performed the song….

  6. M. Sophia Newman
    at 11:41 pm on May 11, 2016

    I looked into this via about half a dozen sources, and ultimately called Ms. Baez’s manager, who says he believes she did perform.

  7. Liz Thomson
    at 3:51 pm on May 17, 2016

    I don’t think she did, in fact I’m certain she didn’t. Don’t think Baez and Dylan appeared on the same bill (after the 1960s) until Rolling Thunder in 1975.
    The Song is on her 1971 album Come from the Shadows.
    Mark Spector was not her manager then so would not be certain.

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.