Modern Library Revue

Modern Library Revue: #28 Tender is the Night

By posted at 6:00 am on February 21, 2013 10

1.
This week marks four years since I began the Modern Library Revue, and herewith its 32nd official installment.  I began the project the way I think people must begin training for a marathon, or eating like a caveman, or going to church: I felt some inner restlessness, some fullness, that needed exercising and exorcising.  I chose the Modern Library list for my spiritual Nordic Trac because I had read one or two novels less than half the novels on it, and thought quite sensibly that this would give me a good head start.  At first, the entries tumbled out of me as fast I could write them.  And in these four years, I’ve managed to read another 30 titles from the list.  But somehow, here we are at a mere 32 Revues.  At this pace, it will be another eight years, God willing, before I finish the enterprise.  (And oh, the party I’ll have.)

Despite my initial aspirations and productivity, I have found that the familiar books have been the hardest to interpret, the most likely to hamstring me over a period of weeks or months. Always they require rereading, and sometimes something more drastic.  I’ve been stalled on Tender is the Night since October, which befuddled me to the extent that, not only did I have to reread it a third time, I had to reread all of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novels and meditate on them before deciding that I know less, possibly, than I did before.

covercovercovercoverI used to feel that the novel output of Fitzgerald was like the literary version of the Myers Briggs test: whichever one a person favored was some fundamental indicator of his or her personality.  Roughly it followed that ordinary and banal people liked The Great Gatsby, snotty, effete types liked This Side of Paradise, and The Beautiful and Damned was for the discerning and unconventional (I’ll let you guess in which camp I numbered myself).  Tender is the Night was sort of an unknown quantity, preferred by dramatic people, maybe, or people who take pills.  This fall, in a classic Modern Library Revue time-suck, I revisited my youthful prejudices, all in service of understanding Fitzgerald’s last, strangest novel.

I can’t say that revisiting my youthful prejudices has confirmed them — This Side of Paradise crept up in my estimation, while The Beautiful and Damned moved slightly down, even while retaining the coveted corner office of my heart.  However, to venture onto a tangent, I can say that The Great Gatsby still remains for me the least stirring of Fitzgerald’s novels.  Perhaps it’s due to some  wellspring of hipster haterade that must deem things played out, or perhaps The Great Gatsby is so great that it has actually managed to play itself out.  After all, it’s as familiar now as the noble bombast penned by Fitzgerald’s own relative, the green light like the rocket’s red flare, the pier at East Egg like the ever-stalwart rampart, the boats beating on like liberty itself.

I feel that The Great Gatsby is the most together, the most surgically artistic effort of a novelist who was more exciting when he was not trying to contain the hot, maudlin, meandering mess of his own talent. (For the record, I also sense something phony about Gatsby’s very phoniness — for me the only convincing poor person Fitzgerald wrote was one who lost his fortune, not one who made it.  Fitzgerald’s poor people were like his black people or his Jews–all characteristics, no character.)

2.
If The Great Gatsby represents the nadir of said hot mess, Tender is the Night is its sprawling apotheosis.  It’s hard to know what to say about this sultry dream of a book. Aesthetically it is very beautiful, the most impressionistic of Fitzgerald’s novels.  A paragraph about Gausse’s Riviera beach makes me want to disport myself in the wine-dark sea, and ruin my skin in the sun wearing pearls and a marcel wave.  There is a striking amount of color: the first two pages features a “tan prayer rug of a beach,” the “pink and cream of old fortifications,” a “purple Alp,” a man in a blue bathrobe, a girl with pink palms.  The first half of the novel is all a bright haze of color, sensation, perception, personality.  The revelation that the life events of the novel’s motley crew of upper-crusters might have anything to do with something like a plot is a surprise when it comes, about a third of the way through the novel.

As a plot, it’s an odd one, full of a kind of fruitless drama and portents that somehow portend both nothing and everything.  Only the flimsiest motives are provided to explain why a man like the superhero Dick Diver, with his jaunty striped shorts and bathing cap, should piss away his life, trade in his professional credibility and crazed beautiful wife and Riviera idylls for a ruined liver and thwarted attempts at grab-ass in sleepy villages along the Hudson.  Even fewer reasons are provided for why we should care.  The demise part is okay — that’s a theme in all the novels past This Side of Paradise.  But Dick and Nicole Diver are the sort of unlikable corollaries of Anthony and Gloria Patch of The Beautiful and Damned, which is a great, old-fashioned morality tale with implacable logic.  I think it’s a shame, how it works out for the Divers, but they never seemed like very fine people to me.

I found an explanation for the novel’s strangeness partly in a 1962 New Yorker profile by Calvin Tomkins about Sara and Gerald Murphy, the original inspiration for Dick and Nicole Diver.  The novel started out to be about the Murphys, and turned, says Tomkins, into a book about the Fitzgeralds (who were also the models for Anthony and Gloria Patch).  These Murphys were real Somebodys, who knew everybody and lived artfully in Paris and on the Riviera, which they actually discovered as a summer destination.

Tomkins’s profile, which is well worth reading, has its own, dare I say, novelistic logic.  I spent the first half of the piece feeling a certain savagery toward the Murphys.  Page one (of thirteen) makes Tender is the Night out to be a turd on the porcelain of the Murphys’ impeccable lives:

“I didn’t like the book when I read it, and I liked it even less on rereading,” Sara said. “I reject categorically any resemblance to us or to anyone we knew at any time.” Gerald, on the other hand, was fascinated to discover…how Fitzgerald had used “everything he noted or was told about by me” during the years that the two couples spent together…Almost every incident, he became aware, almost every conversation in the opening section of the book had some basis in an actual event or conversation involving the Murphys, although it was often altered or distorted in detail.

I found both positions deeply suspect — the vehement denials and the faux naivete about artists, from people who surrounded themselves with artists (Hemingway, Stravinsky, MacLeish, Dos Passos, etc.).  This strain of philistinism was as alienating to me as the impeccable lives:

Those closest to the Murphys find it almost impossible to describe the special quality of their life, or the charm it had for their friends. An evening spent in their fragrant garden, looking out over the water toward Cannes and the mountains beyond, listening to records from Gerald’s encyclopedic collection (everything from Bach to the latest jazz), savoring the delicious food that always seemed to appear, exquisitely prepared and served, at the precise moment and under the precise circumstances guaranteed to bring out all its best qualities (Provençal dishes, for the most part, with vegetables and fruits from the Murphys’ garden, though there was often a typically American dish, such as poached eggs on a bed of creamed corn); the passionate attention to every detail of his guests’ pleasure that gave Murphy himself such obvious pleasure; Sara’s piquant beauty and wit, and the intense joy she took in her life and her friends; the three beautiful children, who seemed, like most children who inhabit a special private world, to be completely at home in adult company (Honoria, who looked like a Renoir and was dressed accordingly; Baoth, robust and athletic; Patrick, disturbingly delicate, and with a mercurial brilliance that made him seem “more Gerald than Gerald”) — all contributed to an atmosphere that most people felt wonderfully privileged to share…

And then came their singing of the “American Negro spirituals.”

(All this, even the title of the profile–“Living Well is the Best Revenge”–made me want to throw their smug lives in their faces.  Revenge against what?  Against the horrible smashup of the Fitzgeralds — one drunk, one crazy — one who died choking on blood, the other on smoke, both before they reached 50?)

Tomkins’s society-page raptures notwithstanding, somewhere around the middle of the thing I began to defrost.  First, there’s the death of two of the Murphys’ children — pain that cannot be extinguished by any amount of exquisite living.  Then, in the excerpts of letters to and from the Murphys and Fitzgeralds, the real depth of their friendship (relationship, better to say), was revealed.  I cannot imagine a relationship of my own bearing so much volatility — surrendering my home to an unhinged friend, placating my other guests when friend flings figs and ashtrays, putting up with his barbs and his staring and his weird questions about money, finally reading myself in his unedifying novel as the beautiful mental patient, the incest victim, the involved but unloving mother.  It would be a lot.

Tomkins’s descriptions of the Murphys’ collective life are very like the tableaux Fitzgerald creates in Tender is the Night.  Here, in the novel, the young film actress Rosemary is entranced by the Divers on the Mediterranean shores:

Rosemary felt that this swim would become the typical one of her life, the one that would always pop up in her memory at the mention of swimming.  Simultaneously the whole party moved toward the water, super-ready from the long, forced inaction, passing from the heat to the cool with the gourmandise of a tingling curry eaten with chilled white wine.  The Divers’ day was spaced like the day of the older civilizations to yield the utmost from the materials at hand, and to give all the transitions their full value, and she did not know that there would be another transition presently from the utter absorption of the swim to the garrulity of the Provencal lunch hour.

What is missing from Tomkins’s account is the resentment that runs through Tender is the Night, the resentment I instinctively felt myself for the Murphys’ Mediterranean menage.  Seen thus, the novel is almost a revenge against the Murphys’ good lives, a preemptive retribution; right around the time that Fitzgerald started to die in Hollywood, Gerald Murphy–whose own melancholy spells Tomkins mentions only in passing–took up the family business, a little outfit called Mark Cross, and did a thriving trade for two decades.  Perhaps the novel even adds some necessary balance to Tomkins’s fulsomeness.

But as the character of Dick Diver transmutes to Fitzgerald himself, the resentment takes on a strange key.  In a novel partly about psychoanalysis, what does it mean that Abe North, the drunk creative type clearly modelled on Fitzgerald, is kicked to death on a spree in New York, a moment that roughly marks the start of Dick Diver’s slow, similarly gin-soaked decline? (Nicole Diver was raped by her father in her lonely adolescence, an event that led to her nervous breakdown.  And yet somehow Dick Diver’s Gendarmo punchout, when his Fitzgeraldian side is ascendant, is five-fold more awful.) The novel even suggests, with Fitzgerald’s characteristic attention to money, that Dick’s demise is a tied to his unmanning financial dependence on Nicole. More resentment, class bitterness transferred.

Tender is the Night is no Gatsby, with everything nailed down tight as a coffin-lid at the end.  When the novel is over, Dick is still shunting around doing God knows what and living off of Nicole, who has been transferred part and parcel to another, less cerebral man.  There’s nary a moral to be had between this novel and its characters.  Yet curiously, even with its multiple lives clumsily conflated — extraordinary lives, furthermore, with outsize amounts of talent, privilege, and misfortune — there is something true and lifelike about this flawed, lovely, befuddling book.  Writing well may not be the best revenge, but a few decades later, it comes pretty close.





Share this article

More from the Millions

10 Responses to “Modern Library Revue: #28 Tender is the Night”

  1. Emma
    at 1:12 pm on February 21, 2013

    This is a really great piece, Lydia. I am ashamed to say that I’ve only read The Great Gatsby, but now I definitely want to dive into Fitzgerald’s other novels.

  2. AD
    at 7:32 pm on February 21, 2013

    Four more years!

    Lovely and thorough as always, Lydia.

  3. Morning Bites: The Fitzgerald Test, Victorian Slang, Lena as Roth, David Berman, and More | Vol. 1 Brooklyn
    at 7:41 am on February 22, 2013

    […] “I used to feel that the novel output of Fitzgerald was like the literary version of the Myers Briggs test: whichever one a person favored was some fundamental indicator of his or her personality.” – Lydia Kiesling on F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Tender is the Night at The Millions. […]

  4. ian
    at 10:52 am on February 22, 2013

    Mod Lib Revue is still one of the (if not the) main reasons to visit The Millions. Hooray for barmy long-running book projects.

    This is a fine excavation of the hinterland of both Fitzgerald and his novel – and I’m intrigued by your thoughts on Gatsby as well. Funny, Gatsby apart I’ve always preferred FSF’s short stories. This book is ripe for a revisit – it must be 20 years since I read it last.

  5. rainer
    at 7:48 pm on February 22, 2013

    wow… first i have to say, i am german. so i read fitzgerald only in translation, but still (well, good translation, i guess…) i love f- scott! also i agree with all what lydia kiesling wrote (well,all i might have understood) about the books of fitzgerald – especially about the “great gatsby”, which is a great book, but in my opinion not as good (as brave, as deep, as honest, as vulnerable, as bleeding, as desperate, as beautiful…) as all of his other novels! for now (after first reading, preliminary verdict…) “tender is the night” is my favourite.

    anyway, thanks for this great article!
    rainer

  6. Megan Campbell
    at 8:38 pm on February 25, 2013

    I have always wanted to get more into the work of Fitzgerald. I loved the “Great Gatsby,” and would be interested in comparing his other work to this one.

  7. Summer Reads 2013 | Married With Books
    at 11:41 pm on April 4, 2013

    […] some of Fitzgerald’s novels because I’ve been wanting to do that ever since I read this awesome installment of Lydia Kiesling’s Modern Library Revue for The […]

  8. Weekly News Roundup | What I'm Trying to Say
    at 7:02 am on June 10, 2013

    […] The Millions rereads Fitzgerald. I always liked Tender Is the Night, but I haven’t reread it since I was a freshman in college. […]

  9. Donna Davis
    at 1:45 pm on October 31, 2013

    Loved your article! Yes, Fitzgerald is no easy guy to analyze but it’s too bad that his alcoholism interfered so much with his life and work. But I’ve loved the guy since I first read “Winter Dreams” and I can’t bear to hear any harsh criticisms about him. I felt the same about the the Murphy’s, and so too, did Hemingway. He stated how much he had loved the couple but once he had separated from his first wife, he blamed the Murphy’s for encouraging him to leave his wife. I believe he actually said, “they collected people like they collected art”…..something to that effect.
    Anyway, thanks so much for your wonderful article. It was a great read!

  10. Elizabeth Colledge
    at 7:43 pm on January 31, 2014

    I recently discovered “The Millions,” and am particularly impressed with Lydia Kiesling’s “Modern Library Revue.” Her fresh takes on the classics stimulate rereading (or first reading, as the case might be). She also encourages one to explore parallel links in culture and art. The 1962 New Yorker profile on the Murphys broadened my appreciation of “Tender is the Night” and Fitzgerald’s circle.
    Thank you!

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.