Modern Library Revue

Modern Library Revue: #36 All the King’s Men

By posted at 6:00 am on April 20, 2012 10

coverThe epigraph to All the King’s Men is from Purgatorio, which happens to be my personal favorite stop on Dante’s guided tour of the celestial realm. It is so favorite a favorite that I had one of its scenes, a somewhat impressionistic rendering of a Doré rendering, tattooed on my forearm in a fit of youthful bravado. (If I have any regrets about this, they are that I have only a dwindling supply of bravado, and only two arms, and only one life to encounter moving things and be altered by them for the duration.) Anyway, it’s an exceedingly helpful epigraph for reading this novel; once Dante has been invoked, he has a way of suffusing everything and providing a theme and trajectory to the work: down, and then up, up, up.

The Divine Comedy has a lot of politics in it, Guelphs and Ghibellines and so forth, because Dante was a political animal who went through the wringer and finally lived out his days in exile, a self-described “party of one.” After centuries, most of us read the poet’s verse and the footnotes prepared by dedicated historians and have only the vaguest sense of who everyone was. Still, we know that they are meaningful in their perdition or their grace.

coverRobert Penn Warren’s tortured narrator, Jack Burden, was a party of one if ever one there was: a failed law student, historian, journalist, henchman, ungentlemanly Southern gent. Like Dante, he is prone to sudden sleep and wandering into error. Warren evidently protested the designation, but I’ll allow that All the King’s Men is a novel about politics in the Dantean sense — politics happens in the story, Guelphs and Ghibellines and hicks and state power and porcine Duffy and inscrutable Stark. But it’s not Willie Stark who makes the lasting impression in this novel. It’s Jack Burden, party of one, who midway through the journey of his life finds himself in a dark wood, the right path lost. He is here to tell us about several generations of honor and shame, about soiling your good name and living, or not living, with the results. There is no one in this novel, save perhaps the long-suffering Lucy, who does not stain him or herself with some kind of wrong.

Dante was a party of one, but he was also a patriot, if we can try and understand the word outside of that dubious 19th-century invention, the nation state. Dante was a Florentine who loved his city; he celebrated and indicted it in his lovely poem in his beloved language. Reading All the King’s Men, I thought a lot about patriotism. This novel is written so beautifully, so stylishly, and feels so American — with all the muddled greatness and shittiness that descriptor implies — that my decrepit patriotism pricked up its ears like it sometimes does when I read a stunning novel about America, in fine American English.

After two foreign wars and all manner of troubling happenings on the domestic front, the thinking American, even while she tells herself that states are a construct, can find herself looking wistfully for uncontentious and productive symbols of homeland pride. In these moments, I settle on rock ‘n’ roll, because I believe that is a genuinely good American invention, one that people from other countries (with the exception of the squares and grumps who turn up in any society) have taken up with great gusto and badass results.

But then, if we work past the hugely powerful instinct to take national ownership in a thing, pride must be tempered by the fact that this American cultural good arose from an indelible stain upon our history. Put very simply, there would be no rock ‘n’ roll, no jazz, if there were no slaves in America. So you recalibrate your patriotic enthusiasm — rock music is a great good with a great evil woven into its roots.

All the King’s Men is a novel that puts shame front and center — personal shame, familial shame, state shame. And see in this novel, that other, larger shame: it’s a novel with “nigger” on the first page, its world reels from the sin of a woman sold down the river. Maybe it’s because the hot, schismatic South has ever had some kind of weird claim on Americanness, but there is something about All the King’s Men that like rock ‘n’ roll seems profoundly American, something paradoxical that makes a person feel like holding up her head about the accident of her citizenship to say, “We made this, so we can’t be all bad,” even while the thing in question in fact confirms that we can be and are that bad — on the national scale, on the universal scale, we’re that bad.

We’re that bad — but some of us can really write.

Can Robert Penn Warren ever write. He’s a poet, and his prose is full of poetry and swagger. It’s not a style I thought I favored; I think of my literary tastes, ironically, as running prim and anglophilic. But perhaps it’s not a style I favor only because it is often imitated, unwittingly or the reverse, with such excruciating results. There are rioting metaphors on every page; cliches lurk around every corner. A hometown hero, a depressive journalist, a yellowing diary, a buried secret, a war, a zaftig bivalvular ex-wife, all written so beautifully I can hardly stand it. My copy is dog-eared the whole way through, the better to find the remarkable passages that proliferate therein.

We had taken lots of swims in the rain, that summer and the summers before when Adam had been with us. We would no doubt have gone that night too, if the rain had been falling a different kind of rain, if it had been a light sweet rain, falling out of a high sky, the kind that barely whispers with a silky sound on the surface of the water you are swimming in, or if had been a driven, needle-pointed, cold, cathartic rain to make you want to run along the beach and yell before you took refuge in the sea, or even if it had been a torrent, the kind you get on the Gulf that is like nothing so much as what happens when the bottom finally bursts out of a big paper bag suspended full of water. But it wasn’t like any of those kinds of rain. It was as though the sky had sagged down as low as possible and there were a universal leaking of bilge down through the black, gummy, dispirited air.

They flow like this, one after another, in a manner that sometimes sounds free-wheeling and unconstructed, like a drugstore poet shooting the breeze between sips from his soda pop. But try to write a letter and sound like Robert Penn Warren. Try to write a story.

I rejoice in this great American novel, a reminder of people’s capacity for those universal states, perdition and grace. Jack Burden says “what we students of history always learn is that the human being is a very complicated contraption and that they are not good or bad but are good and bad and the good comes out of bad and the bad out of good, and the devil take the hindmost.” Jack Burden asks if we are only as a good as the worst thing we’ve ever done and we have to concede it is so. It is so, but there’s a chance of heaven yet. Mentre che la speranza ha fior del verde.





Share this article

More from the Millions

10 Responses to “Modern Library Revue: #36 All the King’s Men”

  1. Edward Champion
    at 8:22 am on April 20, 2012

    It will be some time before I return to this classic (and there is a rather ignoble story of youthful ignorance attached), but your great rejoicing here gives me hope that I will be able to atone my sins. Thanks again, Lydia. One side note: Tom Bissell has suggested that NOSTROMO is “arguably the greatest political novel ever written.” How would you say ALL THE KING’S MEN compares?

  2. Nick Moran
    at 9:04 am on April 20, 2012

    Great review, Lydia! I feel like this .gif should go here: http://bit.ly/I9rBTk

    Also, on the subject of Warren’s poetic writing (and the novel’s familial shame), I’m partial to this passage (which later became the epigraph to Tracy Letts’ play, August: Osage County):

    “The child comes home and the parent puts the hooks in him. The old man, or the woman, as the case may be, hasn’t got anything to say to the child. All he wants is to have that child sit in a chair for a couple of hours and then go off to bed under the same roof. It’s not love. I am not saying that there is not such a thing as love. I am merely pointing to something which is different from love but which sometimes goes by the name of love. It may well be that without this thing which I am talking about there would not be any love. But this thing in itself is not love. It is just something in the blood. It is a kind of blood greed, and it is the fate of a man. It is the thing which man has which distinguishes him from the happy brute creation. When you got born your father and mother lost something out of themselves, and they are going to bust a ham trying to get it back, and you are it. They know they can’t get it all back but they will get as big a chunk out of you as they can. And the good old family reunion, with picnic dinner under the maples, is very much like diving into the octopus tank at the aquarium.”

  3. Edan Lepucki
    at 10:56 am on April 20, 2012

    This was terrific, Lydia.

  4. Michael
    at 1:06 pm on April 20, 2012

    Fun fact:

    The nation state is a dubious 17th-, not 19th-century invention, seeing as it began with the Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and all that.

  5. Matt
    at 3:35 pm on April 20, 2012

    This was great!

    For my money, All The King’s Men is THE American political novel. I picked it up in the bookstore once and literally sat down in the aisle for about 10 or 20 pages until I carted it downstairs and bought the thing, buyer’s anguish take the hindmost.

  6. Ali
    at 4:16 pm on April 20, 2012

    Great post! And you even mentioned Dante, who is one of my all-time favorite poets! I am so impressed that you know the political background to the Divine Comedy and that you actually have a favorite canticle!

  7. Erin
    at 9:53 pm on April 21, 2012

    Bravo, Lydia. This was a great piece and you described so well those contradictions involved with patriotic feelings.

    Also, I understand Lydia’s reference to nationalism as a 19th century construction to refer to the fact that during the aforementioned century developments in the study of linguistics and history, in addition to the growth of communication technology, allowed for groups of people to create national myths. Thus began the call for states whose sovereignty rested in the nation – the general populace – and the acceptance of nationalism as a legitimate political ideology.

  8. Holly LeCraw
    at 10:56 pm on April 22, 2012

    One of my favorites. People always talk about Willie Stark as a great character–and he is–but it’s Jack Burden whom I really love. And also Sugar Boy. And Sadie. Okay, going to find my own dogeared copy now.

  9. Shelley
    at 11:59 am on April 24, 2012

    As far as literature and our current culture go: it’s time for shame to have a big comeback.

  10. Barnstorm | Wednesday Linkstorm
    at 1:35 pm on April 25, 2012

    [...] Robert Penn Warren’s birthday was yesterday. Remember last year when we had that surprise party for him, and you burst in all late and we all shouted “SURPRISE!” but it wasn’t RPW, it was just you, and we were like “ugh, typical”? [...]

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.