Essays

War Games: On Roberto Bolaño’s The Third Reich

By posted at 6:00 am on February 10, 2012 15

Gaming in literature tends to come in two varieties; the high-brow and highly abstract, and the demotic and irredeemably nerdy. Look to puzzles in Perec’s Life, A Users Manual or chess in Nabokov’s The Luzhin Defense, for the former, and sci-fi literature for the latter. Historically-based wargaming has largely fallen through the gap; there is Uncle Toby and Corporal Trim’s effort to recreate the siege of Namur in Tristram Shandy but otherwise it is a hobbyist corner given little literary attention. Until, oddly enough, Roberto Bolaño’s latest exhumed English translation, The Third Reich. This novel, to be clear, takes its name not from that short-lived empire, but from a multiplayer strategy game depicting its span, of which the book’s protagonist is an avid devotee.

coverUdo Berger, vacationing on the Catalan coast with his girlfriend Ingeborg, is not particularly given to sunshine. He spends much of the novel in his hotel room, unfurling scenarios for “The Third Reich” and soon launching into a fraught match with a local. Reviewers of the novel, written in 1990, but released in an English translation late last year, seem to be at some loss to describe just what, in fact, Berger’s wargaming constitutes, with most quickly settling upon the notion that it is “obsessive.” That’s not inaccurate, but it’s a sort of obsession rendered by a clear kindred spirit, with a detail of gameplay description impossible to anyone who wasn’t deeply familiar with the topic. Bolaño, a known enthusiast for these very games (which also cropped up in his Nazi Literture in the Americas), clearly was.

The novel offers a deep look into a pre-electronic world of dizzyingly complex and varied historical boardgaming, in an age when games depicting the Zulu Wars, the Six-Day War, or the hunt for the Bismarck did a brisk business, whether around a table or in elaborate games by mail. The company Avalon Hill, creator of “Rise and Decline of the Third Reich,” spent four decades creating willfully arcane games, with diffuse efforts to simulate the diving speed of a Sopwith Camel, the morale of American Civil War units after a march, and the particular effectiveness of chainshot (two cannonballs chained together) when fired at a sailing ship’s rigging. It should come as no surprise that turns can require more than an hour to complete, even when all players are around the same table. A mail-in card in my copy of “Richtofen’s War: The Air War 1914-1918″ reads, pre-printed “Please send me your colorful brochure describing all Avalon Hill games and Play-by-Mail kits and your exclusive gaming magazine. I swear that I have the necessary grey-matter to enjoy your games.”

It wouldn’t be unfair if this brings to mind the minutiae of role-playing gaming, with one crucial difference: the referent for historical gamers, however quixotic in practice, is history itself, not, say, the Star Wars C-Canon (the third level of verisimilitude in the Star Wars universe). Games invariably include design notes about historical accuracy and many feature separate simply historical accounts of the events depicted. In early years, Avalon Hill advertised a beribboned military advisory staff (featuring Gen. Anthony McAuliffe, of “Nuts” fame at the Battle of the Bulge) and provided a forum for heavily footnoted historical arguments on gaming accuracy in its monthly magazine The General. There, arguments over scenarios, tweaks, and historical fealty unfolded, issue after issue. If sci-fi gaming offered countless occasions for spiritual and factual improvisation, board wargaming is a realm for high-church scriptural literalists.

The Third Reich’s protagonist, Udo Berger, is not merely a gamer, but a participant in these very arguments: a contributor to The General and several of its peers, and a holder of spirited opinions on real-life magazine contributors (it might please Michael Anchors, genuine wargaming author, to learn Berger’s opinion that he is “original and full with enthusiasm.”) Berger’s contributions run in the range of gameplay, “obliterating essays by Benjamin Clark (Waterloo #14) and Jack Corso (The General, #3, vol. 17) in which each advises against the creation of more than one front in the first year.”

Berger’s projects entail substantial hours spent in solitary indoor play, an admittedly curious direction for a beach vacation. As the hotel owner’s wife comments “A winter sport; at this time of year you’d do better to swim or play tennis.” His gameplay reveries stretch considerably into the technical:

In any deployment the strongest hex will be the one where the English armored corps is located, whether P23 or O23, and it will determine the focus of the German attack. This attack will be carried out with very few units. If the English armored corps is in P23, the German attack will be launched from O24; if, on the contrary, the English armored corps is in O23, the attack must be launched from the N24, through the south of Belgium.

And so on. Much of this must sound like shorthand for “obsession”, yet this sort of thinking is precisely what is required in playing a game such as “The Third Reich.” You need not necessarily abandon the outside world entirely (and Berger does not) but a commitment of time and thought is essential to any sort of viability in the game. Just as Nabokov’s Luzhin undertakes:

At first he learned to replay the immortal games that remained from former tournaments — he would rapidly glance over the notes of chess and silently move the pieces on his board. Now and then this or that move, provided in the text with an exclamation or a question mark (depending upon whether it had been beautifully or wretchedly played), would be followed by several series of moves in parentheses, since that remarkable move branched out like a river and every branch had to be traced to its conclusion before one returned to the main channel.

Luzhin’s father, aware of these locked-up hours, comes to suspect that Luzhin is “looking for pictures of naked women.” Undistracted calculations of such sort are essential to any complex game; it is a solitary vice which would no doubt be more easily understood were it lubricious.

Berger, though, as indicated, is more than an ordinary player, and while he plots inside, his girlfriend, Ingeborg, takes up more conventional frolics, in the company of another German couple, Charley and Hanna, and itinerant Spaniards known as the Wolf and the Lamb. Soon Hanna shows up with a black eye, suffered at Charley’s hand, and Charley simply disappears. In the aftermath of the investigation of his disappearance both Ingeborg and Hanna depart; Udo stays on beyond the term of his vacation, in a morbid wait for Charley’s corpse, intensifying a flirtation with the wife of the hotel’s owner, growing increasingly curious about the reclusive ailing owner, and drifting into a game of “The Third Reich” with El Quemado, a laconic and severely burned beach paddleboat renter.

Udo, unsurprisingly, first routs the amateur El Quemado, “He doesn’t know how to stack the counters, he plays sloppily, he has either no grand strategy or one that is too schematic, he trusts in luck, he makes mistakes in his calculations of BRP, he confuses the creation of units phase with the SR.” And yet soon this formerly abstracted game takes on a very personal charge, as Udo’s macabre wait for a corpse continues. Udo, along the beach one evening, overhears someone providing El Quemado advice on the game; a figure he suspects is the hotel owner, who he suspects is opening a second front, as it were, in response to Udo’s flirtations with his wife.

Thus, Frau Else’s husband has news of me from two sources: El Quemado tells him about the match and his wife tells him about our flirtation. I’m the one at a disadvantage; I don’t know anything about him, except that he’s sick. But I can guess a few things. He wants me to leave; he wants me to lose the match; he doesn’t want me to sleep with his wife. The Eastern Offensive continues. The armored wedge (four corps) meets and pierces the Western front at Smolensk, then goes on to take Moscow, which falls in an Exploitation move.

It needn’t be explained at this point that the only conceivable drive on Moscow would originate with the Axis player — Berger, of Stuttgart, which raises a second crucial aspect of the game and its role in the novel. Perhaps lost in the myopia of the board, I hadn’t considered, for years until reading the novel, the implacably strange appearance of spending countless leisure hours in order to achieve victory not for say, Team Red, but for Nazi Germany, and in The Third Reich several characters wonder about this very reasonable question. A hotel maid asks Udo, “are you a Nazi?” The question acquires increasingly dire weight as, over time, the fall of Berlin looms in the game itself. As the hotel owner observes: “Ah, my friend, in that poor boy’s nightmares the trial may be the most important part of the game, the only thing that makes it worthwhile to spend so many hours playing it. A chance to hang the Nazis!”

In fact, Berger declares that he’s “more like an anti-Nazi” and we’re given no reason to doubt him whatsoever; that said, it’s no surprise that the enthusiasm of a German for steering Germany would raise eyebrows. This brings to the fore the aspect of gaming that Bolaño exploits most deftly: the almost unavoidable historical romanticism that attends most wargaming.

Despite the profusion of novelty chess sets, a chess piece seems most frequently a blank signifier, a store of potential for movement; a Knight rarely seems imbued with the qualities of Lancelot or Gawain. Historical wargaming, however, tends to inevitably accentuate links between a subject and its representation. Berger fantasizes about “symbolic figures with the ability to storm into your dreams,” recalling favorite maneuvers, “Rommel’s ride with the 7th Armored in ’40. Student falling on Crete, Kleist’s advance through the Caucasus with the First Panzer Army, Manteuffel’s offensive in the Ardennes with the Eleventh Army.”

Is this something only a German would do, a sign of some latent crypto-fascism? No, it’s something that countless wargamers do, and nothing unusual in a recreation reliant upon the approximated capacities and skills of very real former generals, units, and armies, about whom there are countless very specific monographs published each year (conduct an Amazon search for upcoming history books; the number of volumes on military history is typically only slightly below the number on American history). Ambrogio Spinola’s actual function in a battle might be to provide an outflanking factor of 6, but he’s also the victor depicted in Velazquez’s “The Surrender of Breda.” Albrecht Von Wallenstein may prove functionally inferior to Gustavus Adolphus in leadership points, but he’s also the subject of three Schiller plays; background that one does not simply forget. Berger, of course, takes this a bit father.

If El Quemado had the slightest knowledge or appreciation of twentieth-century German literature (and it’s likely that he does) I’d tell him that Manstein is like…Celan. And Paulus is like Trakl, and his predecessor, Reichenau, is like Heinrich Mann. Guderian is the equivalent of Jünger, and Kluge of Boll.

Is this typical? Well, no, it is mildly absurd, and yet a sense of just where Berger’s enthusiasm rests offers a captivating puzzle; is this crypto-nationalism or is it merely gaming ad absurdum? At one point, Else asks “And what does it mean to be German?” Berger responds, “I don’t know exactly. Something difficult, that’s for sure. Something that we’ve gradually forgotten.” Is this an effort to construct some untroubled national identity through fantasy, to reconstruct devastation into art, reducing war to its tactical essence and leaving out anything that is unsavory? Perhaps. Whatever the case, it’s been a pursuit with essentially no consequence — until the game with El Quemado begins and Berger begins to suspect that darker consequences may loom.

It’s clearly not unusual to append dire consequences to the outcome of a game; one can always play chess with death. It is unusual to align these antagonists with any sense of national identification; most games do not lend themselves to the practice. A German playing Germany in a World War II simulation makes for a far different landscape, however. And whether Berger’s fears are those of a fantasist recluse imagining threats or of a suppressed recidivist realizing that refashioning history might have some consequence is a tantalizing question, all made possible through Bolaño’s superb exploration of just what conflating these two tendencies might produce. An attack on Moscow might merely involve a roll of the dice, but it might involve quite more.

Image Credit: Flickr/Bien Stephenson





Share this article

More from the Millions

15 Responses to “War Games: On Roberto Bolaño’s The Third Reich”

  1. Will
    at 7:01 am on February 10, 2012

    For more wargaming in literature, there’s also the work of Iain (M) Banks. The author enjoys strategy games himself, and they make an appearance in several of his books. Notably “The Player of Games” is entirely concerned with a civilisation that is culturally and politically focused on a strategy wargame; sci-fi, yes, but also fine and thoughtful literature. “The Steep Approach to Garbadale” considers a rich family which made its money selling a strategy boardgame. And “Complicity” also involves a Sid Meier-style strategy computer game, although it’s tangential to the plot. “Walking on Glass” contains much offbeat consideration of gaming in general.

    Fun bonus fact: Guy Debord also developed a strategy wargame.

  2. Mike
    at 1:07 pm on February 10, 2012

    Well, shit; I guess you liked it. Way to tell someone who hasn’t read it everything that happens. Thanks for the article. I liked ‘The Third Reich’, too.
    By the way, for some old school wargaming in literature, check out Faulkner’s ‘The Unvanquished’, wherein Bayard and his pal Ringo map out the siege of Vicksburg. Good stuff.

  3. “The Third Reich” Is Just a Game… Or Is It? « 10 Billion Canons
    at 2:45 pm on February 10, 2012

    [...] a nice essay by Anthony Paletta on gaming in literature: Gaming in literature tends to come in two varieties; [...]

  4. Mark D.
    at 7:11 pm on February 10, 2012

    Fantastic essay Anthony!

    I’m a big fan of the game in question, as well as the Avalon Hill Game Company (and all their contemporaries). I created The Boardgaming Life web site (www.theboardgaminglife.com) with the intention of publishing detailed board game reviews and strategy articles, in an attempt to fill a small part of the void left by the demise of “The General” magazine. So, needless to say, this book sounds extremely odd, but I feel compelled to read it (mostly due to your description of it).

    Thanks for directing our attention to this book. I plan to read it, and I’m hoping it’s as good as your essay!

    Thanks!
    Mark

  5. Nicholas
    at 7:51 pm on February 10, 2012

    Excellent article. Apart from Distant Star, I think it’s Bolano’s most disturbing novel, with such a dark, electric undercurrent. The Wolf and the Lamb happen to be, simultaneously, comical and terrifying characters.

  6. MikeJake
    at 10:25 am on February 13, 2012

    “Perhaps lost in the myopia of the board, I hadn’t considered, for years until reading the novel, the implacably strange appearance of spending countless leisure hours in order to achieve victory not for say, Team Red, but for Nazi Germany…”

    As a casual war game enthusiast, in my experience the reason players enjoy trying to lead Nazi Germany to victory is that it presents a fun strategic challenge. You get to lead an excellent military force against larger enemies (in most cases, the Soviet Union) and try to achieve a quick, decisive victory. There’s an excellent computer game called Gary Grigsby’s War in the East that simulates the entire Eastern Front, and it’s fun to plan and execute big strategic offensives like Barbarossa, attempting to succeed where Germany failed. Generally these games avoid going into the unsavory specifics of the actions of the Einsatzgruppen (as one example) in favor of a purely military focus.

    On the flipside, many players also enjoy the challenge of leading the Soviet Union, holding out against the Nazi onslaught, and eventually mastering an unwieldy but powerful Red Army and marching to Berlin, while abstracting away the specific atrocities that occurred (as one example, the Soviets executed over a division’s-worth of their own soldiers at Stalingrad, something that might be simulated by a lower morale rating or higher attrition for their units). Or you might try your hand at getting the western Allies to Berlin before Christmas 1944. It’s the historical sandbox aspect that is compelling.

    So when Rich Iott, who ran for a House seat in Ohio in 2010, was revealed to have been a member of a reenactment group based on the 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking, I mostly believed him when he said he did it for fun and historical interest. I thought it was more nerdy than reflective of malicious personal beliefs.

  7. Saving Rudolph in Goshen | Metropolis POV | Metropolis Magazine
    at 9:07 am on May 8, 2012

    [...] living in Brooklyn. He has written for The Wall Street Journal, Bookforum, City Journal, and The Millions on urban policy, cinema, historic preservation, and literature, and Metropolis on fallout shelter [...]

  8. Bright Solutions from the Dark Age of Urban Planning | Metropolis POV | Metropolis Magazine
    at 3:36 pm on June 28, 2012

    [...] living in Brooklyn. He has written for The Wall Street Journal, Bookforum, City Journal, and The Millions on urban policy, cinema, historic preservation, and literature, and Metropolis on fallout shelter [...]

  9. Concrete | Metropolis POV | Metropolis Magazine
    at 10:10 am on October 15, 2012

    [...] in Brooklyn. He has written for The Wall Street Journal, The Awl, Bookforum, City Journal, and The Millions on urban policy, cinema, historic preservation, and literature, and Metropolis on Boston city [...]

  10. Condo Living | Metropolis POV | Metropolis Magazine
    at 8:01 am on December 17, 2012

    [...] in Brooklyn. He has written for The Wall Street Journal, The Awl, Bookforum, City Journal, and The Millions on urban policy, cinema, historic preservation, and literature, and Metropolis on Long Island [...]

  11. 20th Century World Architecture | Metropolis POV | Metropolis Magazine
    at 8:01 am on January 3, 2013

    [...] in Brooklyn. He has written for The Wall Street Journal, The Awl, Bookforum, City Journal, and The Millions on urban policy, cinema, historic preservation, and literature, and Metropolis on Long Island [...]

  12. New Book on James Stirling | Metropolis POV | Metropolis Magazine
    at 10:04 am on March 11, 2013

    [...] in Brooklyn. He has written for The Wall Street Journal, The Awl, Bookforum, City Journal, and The Millions on urban policy, cinema, historic preservation, and literature, and Metropolis on Long Island [...]

  13. Racecourse Architecture | Metropolis POV | Metropolis Magazine
    at 12:02 pm on April 19, 2013

    [...] and has written otherwise for The Wall Street Journal, The Daily Beast, The Awl, Bookforum, and The Millions on urban policy, cinema, historic preservation, and literature, and Metropolis on Long Island [...]

  14. Wes
    at 1:08 pm on June 16, 2013

    Well done, old friend. I am truly sorry that I made you be the Nazis every time.

  15. Board Wargaming, What Fun | Anthony Paletta
    at 5:22 pm on June 20, 2013

    [...] Read me at The Millions on “War Games: On Roberto Bolano’s ‘The Third Reich.’”  [...]

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.