Year in Reading

A Year in Reading: Scott Esposito (Conversational Reading)

By posted at 3:00 pm on December 4, 2011 6

coverRight now, the book that I read in 2011 that exists most powerfully in my mind is The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge by Rainer Maria Rilke. Rilke, of course, is best known as a poet, and this was the only novel he wrote. Perhaps that is why it functions like no novel I have ever read. The book consists of Brigge’s experiences of Paris (and they are obviously autobiographical to an extent, as Rilke visited Paris for the first time at about the same age as Brigge). In this series of self-contained journal entries, Rilke creates a portrait of something powerful and mysterious (something that would later come to inhabit the fiction of Kafka and Beckett), bound together by a poetic logic. I would like to some day take apart some of these sections just to figure out how they worked, but I think to do that I might have to destroy them, as sometimes happens with paintings when scientists peel them apart to see what is underneath the final layers of paint.

coverTo continue with the literature/painting metaphor, I’ll also recommend The Prose of the World by the French critic and philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty. This was his final book, and it remains uncompleted, and in it are expressed remarkable thoughts about the nature of language and its relationship to perception. I’m not too versed in the inter-relationships of French philosophers, but I can only guess that Merleau-Ponty in some way anticipated or instructed Roland Barthes, as there is much correspondence between the writing of both men.

Lastly, to recommend a couple of books published in 2011: first is My Two Worlds by Sergio Chejfec. I’ve explained my feelings for My Two Worlds in an essay that I will quote:

My Two Worlds is a dance, a seduction that draws us right up to the palpable center and then fades away to the margin, drawing one back toward that center before fading into another marginal space — back and forth, round and round. It is that same haze of thought one feels when hovering around an idea that remains unelucidatable. Yet the book is merely Chejfec’s thoughts over the course of a walk. It is two hours of serpentine meditation, that same maddening dart and weave between significance and insignificance, transcendence and babble. The best description for the book — one that might also be suitable for Sebald — is to call My Two Worlds a fragmentation of gazes.

coverAs for a second book, I have to give pride of place to my friend Barrett Hathcock’s first novel, The Portable Son, just published by Aqueous Books. Obviously I’m biased (although I have been publishing Barrett for five years at The Quarterly Conversation, so it’s not like I’m a latecomer), so don’t take my word for it — take the word of Publishers Weekly, which gave the book a starred review and wrote, “Hathcock writes haunting, unforgettable stories.” Or you could take Michael Martone, who writes, “The Portable Son makes new the New South effortlessly, effervescently, and endlessly.” Or Diane Johnson: “Barrett Hathcock is a writer I know and think is one to watch. I look forward to the debut of his work.”

And just to toss a few final 2011 releases at you: Never Any End to Paris by Enrique Vila-Matas, Suicide by Edouard LevĂ©, Lightning Rods by Helen DeWitt, and George Craig’s excellent pamphlet on translating Beckett, Writing Beckett’s Letters.

More from A Year in Reading 2011

Don’t miss: A Year in Reading 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005

The good stuff: The Millions’ Notable articles

The motherlode: The Millions’ Books and Reviews

Like what you see? Learn about 5 insanely easy ways to Support The Millions, The Millions on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr.





Share this article

More from the Millions

6 Responses to “A Year in Reading: Scott Esposito (Conversational Reading)”

  1. David
    at 8:24 pm on December 4, 2011

    There are readers and there are Readers. I, alas, am a mere reader. But a Reader could not love reading any more than I do. The intellectual hurdles I am unequal to notwithstanding.

    Nothing snide here. I’ve been aware of the diversity of The Millions readership for years. We still meet at the same place which is passionate reading.

  2. Mark Olague
    at 12:40 am on December 5, 2011

    I wonder if Scott prefers the Dalkey translation or the Penguin, or are they both the same? No one has mentioned, nor have we sufficiently paid due respect, to the greatest literary event this year (since we’re talking about Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge) and that is Emilio Tascano Tegui’s On the Elegance of Sleeping. By far the most thrilling thing I’ve read this year.

  3. Daniel
    at 4:46 am on December 5, 2011

    Those looking for an affordable copy of Writing Beckett’s Letters by George Craig should either visit one of the bookshops listed at Sylph Edition’s Website or order the cahier — which should cost 16 as opposed to 60 dollars — directly at http://www.sylpheditions.com/Cahiers/16.html

  4. Greg Gerke
    at 8:50 am on December 5, 2011

    Great list Scott. I also just read the Notebooks – Dalkey (Pike) translation. I’ve read both Mitchell and Pike’s and I have to say there are both incredible things going on in each. Maybe Mitchell is more poetic, but Pike brings out something else, and what it is is hard to say. He calls an “edge.” Two women at UIC explored the differences: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/trainor1/errtpapers/Comparing%20the%20Similarities%20and%20Differences%20between%20Two%20Translations.pdf

    There is the Hulse edition (above) and a Norton (he’s the translator) edition as well. Rilke’s masterpiece surely deserves many interpretations.

  5. m
    at 4:05 pm on December 6, 2011

    Scott Esposito balls.

  6. Favorite Reads of 2011: My Two Worlds by Sergio Chejfec | Conversational Reading
    at 12:24 pm on December 9, 2011

    [...] Reads of 2011: My Two Worlds by Sergio Chejfec I already mentioned this one in a “favorite reads” post I did for The Millions. My Two Worlds is truly large, and deep, and expansive, even though [...]

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.