Inter Alia and Screening Room

Inter Alia #18: Julia Child and the Ethical Appeal

By posted at 6:40 am on August 19, 2009 5

coverProminent among my childhood memories is the voice of Julia Child. Or rather, the voice of my father imitating Julia Child. Ours was (you’ll be shocked to learn) a PBS household, and the pseudo-Julia arias he would deliver while making Chicken Dish – in that swooping, fluty, Childian soprano – were guaranteed to crack me up, as was his Maggie Thatcher. (Come to think of it, they were pretty much the same impression). And so this year, when the first posters for Julie & Julia began to appear, I thought I knew what I was in for: some laughs, some game-fowl, and Meryl Streep trilling, “Save the liver!”

coverWhat the movie and the attendant retrospectives of the real-life Julia Child suggest, however, is less a figure of fun than a figure of liberation. In a country that has never quite outgrown its Puritan pedigree, here was a woman fearless about all things sensual: food, sex, and her own big, lovely body. Seen in this light, Mastering the Art of French Cooking amounts to a kind of manifesto in defense of pleasure. I don’t own that particular book, but Julie & Julia sent me back to Child’s slightly less-famous opus, The Way to Cook, which had been sitting neglected on a shelf in my kitchen. And Julia Child turns out not only to have been a kind of unfussy feminist; she was also a terrific writer.

It’s not often we think of recipes as a form of literature, but they are as formally exacting as the Spenserian stanza (and, as anyone who’s ever ruined $40 worth of lamb knows, the stakes are higher). The Way to Cook is a model of clarity and pragmatism. Moreover, it offers a master class in rhetoric.

In my freshman comp classes, we talk about the three classic rhetorical appeals: logos, pathos, and ethos. Most any piece of rhetoric makes all three appeals simultaneously, but a good rhetor will emphasize one or the other. The first two are fairly easy to grasp; the pathetic appeal (a.k.a. the appeal to emotions) is the mode of contemporary advertising, and is thus ascendant in American discourse. (Death panels, anyone?) Other voices will attempt to correct for widespread abuse of pathos by focusing on the logical appeal (a.k.a. the appeal to reason). Thus, we get liberal pundits reasoning themselves blue in the face: But there are no death panels in these bills! Alas, in cooking, politics, and other inexact sciences, head does not always trump heart. To mediate between the claims of each, we must look to that mysterious creature: ethos.

As I understand it, the ethical appeal has to do with establishing the speaker’s credibility, or the attractiveness of her persona. One approach might be simply to flourish one’s expertise. But, in our postmodern age, the conspicuous display of expertise too easily gives rise to charges of elitism. (Charges which, because they are essentially pathetic, are impossible to rebut.) Contemporary masters of the ethical appeal – among them David Foster Wallace, Jane Jacobs, and my quondam dentist, Dr. Bob Cargill – use the vast resources of voice to make us want to trust them. And how do they do this? By trusting us. By respecting our intelligence. By making a point of showing all their cards and giving a fair assessment of the strength of the overall hand. And above all, by acknowledging that we have the freedom to disagree.

Notwithstanding that overweening title – The Way to Cook – the power of Julia Child’s ethical appeal is that rather than seeking to bully or lecture or intimidate or dazzle us (which, of course, she could) she writes as though we are working in the kitchen alongside her. She allows that there are different approaches to cooking; she frequently suggests that, in her experience, some complication is necessary and some is not. And she does all this with constant, gentle humor. Here is her introduction to game birds:

Since all birds roast in about the same manner, and simmer, sauté, and stew in almost the same way, you’ll find them grouped together that way here, for the most part. It makes more sense, it seems to me; then you have the theory and practice for each technique, whatever your bird happens to be. Actually, it would make even more sense to group the beasts along with the birds . . . but I have resisted carrying logic that far.

Compare to Martha Stewart, a fine writer and cook but an imperialist of logos if ever there was one. Here’s a classic example, first noted by Anthony Lane, of Martha’s single-minded, logical pursuit of the very best:

Locate an area in advance with tender, young, organically grown grass that has not yet been cut. . . . It is best to cut it very early in the morning while the dew is still evident.

It is evident that Martha has lost sight of her context – a recipe for baked ham – and thus of her audience. How much she presumes about us: our lives, our patience, our willingness to go along with her harebrained schemes! Her ham might taste just as good as, or even better than, Child’s, but the cook will feel too humbled, or even belittled, to enjoy it much.

coverI would suggest that the same principles of ethos that make The Way to Cook so effective – mastery lightly worn and a pronounced solicitude for the reader – might translate well to other fields. Even, perhaps, to literary criticism. A truly great critic has two jobs – to judge and to persuade – but some of our most polished logicians seem sometimes to forget the ethical appeal entirely. Aspirants to the throne of E.M. Forster and Leslie Fiedler could do worse than to study The Way to Cook. Julia Child’s voice on the page proves as indelible as her voice on the tube.

[Image credit: foodista]





Share this article

More from the Millions

5 Responses to “Inter Alia #18: Julia Child and the Ethical Appeal”

  1. Sarah McCoy
    at 5:50 pm on August 19, 2009

    Here, here, Garth! What a wonderful treatise. Having taught university freshman comp, I’d say this is an A++ illustration of logos, pathos, and ethos. Nicely done! And being a bit of a foodie, a feminist and a writer, I’m particularly partial to Julia Child. (Partial= I adore the lady.) So I’m pleased as punch to see her celebrated again.

    As well, I loved your concluding remarks. Obviously, you and The Millions team hold yourselves to a higher echelon of literary criticism, and for that you have my heartfelt appreciation!

    http://www.sarahmccoy.wordpress.com

  2. Kim
    at 2:33 am on August 21, 2009

    I enjoyed the movie and then went to the bookstore to look for “Mastering,” saw how many steps were in the recipes and put it down. I returned home to my The Way to Cook, the cookbook that gave me recipes but even more so the confidence to cook well even in the midst of a hectic lifestyle.

  3. Sue
    at 1:51 pm on August 21, 2009

    Excellent analysis! Thank you for thinking this out and posting your piece. I admire Julia Child, and have many of her books. This explains why I am above-all a fan of Martha, though, I must say. There are those of us who are a little Asperger’s, or whatever, for whom the logos-style approach resonates most deeply. I am in that unfortunate class. However, that said, displays of ethos are beautiful, if not always resonant. As for pathos–completely lost on me.

  4. Paria
    at 4:00 am on August 24, 2009

    What a terrific essay — I’ve always felt much more kindly inclined toward Julia than toward Martha, but I could never quite put my finger on why. I realized after reading your piece that it is precisely because, while Martha always manages to make me feel woefully inadequate, Julia empowers me to rise to the occasion. Yay Julia, and yay Mr. Hallberg for an excellent analysis

  5. Publications « Garth Risk Hallberg
    at 2:43 pm on January 5, 2012

    [...] Francisco Goldman – The Art of Political Murder * Vikram Chandra – Sacred Games *  Julia Child – The Way to Cook * Lydia Davis – Varieties of Disturbance * Samuel R. Delany – Dahlgren * Helen DeWitt  – [...]

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.